Rubric

=Rubric=

Cindy, I made some changes and added point values with the content weighted more. I've left it as an excel file so it will be easier to incorporate into our final Word doc.



I put in a lot different categories for these two rubrics so that we can decide which ones we might like to keep and which ones we might like to discard. Please look it over and let me know. I'll modify it to fit the project--or anyone else can, of course! I decided to create two so that we can figure out what to use in our study.






 * Multimedia Project : Research Study Multimedia Project ||  ||   ||
 * Student Name: ||  ||
 * CATEGORY || 4 || 3 || 2 || 1 ||
 * Attractiveness || Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. || Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. || Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. || Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentaion content. ||
 * Organization || Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. || Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. || Content is logically organized for the most part. || There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. ||
 * Content
 * Attractiveness || Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance the presentation. || Makes good use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance to presentation. || Makes use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from the presentation content. || Use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. but these often distract from the presentaion content. ||
 * Organization || Content is well organized using headings or bulleted lists to group related material. || Uses headings or bulleted lists to organize, but the overall organization of topics appears flawed. || Content is logically organized for the most part. || There was no clear or logical organizational structure, just lots of facts. ||
 * Content

Times 2 || Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. || Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. || Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. || Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. ||
 * Originality || Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. || Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. || Uses other people's ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. || Uses other people's ideas, but does not give them credit. ||
 * Mechanics || No misspellings or grammatical errors. || Three or fewer misspellings and/or mechanical errors. || Four misspellings and/or grammatical errors. || More than 4 errors in spelling or grammar. ||
 * Presentation

Remove! || Well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. || Rehearsed with fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention most of the time. || Delivery not smooth, but able to maintain interest of the audience most of the time. || Delivery not smooth and audience attention often lost. ||
 * Permissions || All permissions to use graphics "borrowed" from web pages or scanned from books have been requested, received, printed and saved for future reference. || All permissions to use graphics "borrowed" from web pages or scanned from books have been requested and received. || Most permissions to use graphics "borrowed" from web pages or scanned from books have been requested and received. || Permissions were not requested for several graphics "borrowed" from web pages or scanned from books. ||


 * Multimedia Project Rubric ||
 * Student Name: ||  ||
 * CATEGORY || 4 || 3 || 2 || 1 ||
 * Content - Accuracy || All content throughout the presentation is accurate. There are no factual errors. || Most of the content is accurate but there is one piece of information that might be inaccurate. || The content is generally accurate, but one piece of information is clearly flawed or inaccurate. || Content is typically confusing or contains more than one factual error. ||
 * Sequencing of Information || Information is organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next card. || Most information is organized in a clear, logical way. One card or item of information seems out of place. || Some information is logically sequenced. An occasional card or item of information seems out of place. || There is no clear plan for the organization of information. ||
 * Spelling and Grammar || Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors. || Presentation has 1-2 misspellings, but no grammatical errors. || Presentation has 1-2 grammatical errors but no misspellings. || Presentation has more than 2 grammatical and/or spelling errors. ||
 * Originality || Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way. || Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way. || Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 cards. || Presentation is a rehash of other people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought. ||
 * Text - Font Choice & Formatting || Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content. || Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability. || Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read. || Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material. ||
 * Use of Graphics || All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation. || A few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the presentation. || All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation. || Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation. ||
 * Background || Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card and is appropriate for the topic. || Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card. || Background does not detract from text or other graphics. || Background makes it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the page. ||
 * Text - Font Choice & Formatting || Font formats (e.g., color, bold, italic) have been carefully planned to enhance readability and content. || Font formats have been carefully planned to enhance readability. || Font formatting has been carefully planned to complement the content. It may be a little hard to read. || Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material. ||
 * Use of Graphics || All graphics are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation. || A few graphics are not attractive but all support the theme/content of the presentation. || All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation. || Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation. ||
 * Background || Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card and is appropriate for the topic. || Background does not detract from text or other graphics. Choice of background is consistent from card to card. || Background does not detract from text or other graphics. || Background makes it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the page. ||